• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9801
  • Authors and editors
EVENTS
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Kent and Surrey Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Society
  • Wellbeing
  • Region
  • Global
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Society
  • Wellbeing
  • Region
  • Global
No Result
View All Result
Kent and Surrey Bylines
Home Politics Democracy

Proportional Representation: what is good about it?

Is proportional representation more Democratic? The author examines whether the UK needs PR for a new political system

Graham Simpson by Graham Simpson
03-07-2022 07:00 - Updated on 25-05-2023 10:19
in Democracy
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
Houses of Parliament

Photo by Serena Repice Lentini on Unsplash

Share on Bluesky

What is democracy?

First of all, maybe we should define what democracy is. It’s generally described as a form of government in which ultimate power is vested in the people and exercised by their elected agents (in the UK by MPs) via a free and fair electoral system.

This would imply that the votes of the people should be reflected in the elected agents they vote for. Under our current voting system they are clearly not. let me explain why not:

It took just 38,300 votes to elect a Conservative MP, but it took 864,743 votes to elect 1 Green MP. Our ‘First Past The Post’ (FPTP) electoral system punishes parties that have huge support across the country but don’t have enough support in constituencies to elect an MP. Generally Labour does well because they have support in cities and urban areas while the Tories do well as they have support in the towns and villages. The Greens, Liberal Democrats and Brexit voters are spread out across the country so have very poor representation in our Parliament.

Majority of 80 for 43.6% of the vote

Our current government is an example of how FPTP skews the result of an election in favour of major parties. At the last General Election in 2019, the Conservative government had the support of only 43.6% of the votes cast but were rewarded with an overwhelming majority of MPs, a majority of 80, which gave them total power even though a majority wanted a different government.

A huge number of voters were effectively disenfranchised. Of the 32 million votes cast, only 9.4 million votes (29.2% of the total) were ‘decisive’ in securing a candidate’s election. 14.5 million people (45.3% of all voters) cast their vote for a non-elected candidate, while 8.1 million votes (25.5%) were ‘surplus’, ie they were cast for the elected candidate but did not contribute to their election. So over 22.6 million votes (70.8%) did not contribute to electing an MP. One could say that they were wasted.

Under a proportional representation (PR) voting system no votes are wasted. The share of seats a party wins would exactly match the share of votes it receives.

There are several arguments against Proportional Representation

Some opponents to PR argue that

a) you would lose the vital link between the MP and their constituency: This does not seem the case as nearly all PR systems retain a constituency link.

Others worry

b) that people would be elected representing ‘extreme’ parties: But, shouldn’t a democracy give all views within the law a voice however distasteful?

The argument for PR is not based on the belief that it will elect people we agree with; it’s based on a belief in the advantages of an open, free democracy. A safeguard is also possible, like in Germany where you must have a threshold of votes before someone is elected in order to exclude cranks.

Finally, some people are concerned that

c) PR leads to unstable governments: PR systems are used successfully throughout Europe. When there is instability it generally reflects tensions and divisions within a society. Plus there have been plenty of unstable British governments elected by our own electoral system.

Examining the Pros and Cons of PR, it seems that there are issues with the current FPTP system and PR comes out as the winner.

The advantages of Proportional Representation

  • Every vote counts
  • No votes are ‘wasted’
  • It returns a Parliament which truly reflects the views of the voters
  • It encourages collaboration, cooperation and consensus
  • Those elected tend to come from more diverse backgrounds
  • know they have to appeal to the whole country and not just the few ‘marginals’ which normally determine who wins.
  • No party can govern unless they get a majority of the popular vote or they have reached an agreement with another party which gives them a majority.
    New politics in the UK

There is a growing consensus that we need new politics in the UK, one that promotes collaboration rather than division. The majority of Labour members and affiliated unions want the party to adopt PR as official policy. The vote at the Labour Conference in September will be pivotal. Nearly all the other parties apart from the Conservatives want it. The time has come to upgrade our democracy.

Graham Simpson

Graham Simpson

Related Posts

A crowd carrying flags at a rally in support of Tisza
Democracy

Orbán’s reign of fear versus Magyar’s inclusive nationalism

by Magdalena Williams
21 March 2026 - Updated on 30 May 2026
Two Labubu dolls with cake on a table
Democracy

Trump’s Tariffs and Toys

by Charlotte Mbali
23 January 2026
A leaflet on a lamppost with three fists in a diagonal line of different races. Below it is written 'We got no choice but a voice!'
Democracy

The voice of the nation – who speaks for Britain?

by Gerry Mitchell
13 December 2025 - Updated on 30 May 2026
A line of voters put their ballot cards into ballot boxes
Democracy

UK electoral revolution? The future of First Past the Post

by Tetiana Toma
9 December 2025
Flag of Moldovia, red vertical block then yellow in the middle with a crest, and then blue block near the flag pole
Democracy

Elections in Moldova, Czech republic and Hungary

by Tetiana Toma
5 November 2025 - Updated on 30 May 2026
Next Post
Voting In elections

Democratic elections – in the UK and South Africa

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

Kent and Surrey Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Kent, Surrey and beyond.

Kent & Surrey Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2021-2026 Kent & Surrey Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9801

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
    • Brexit
    • Defence
    • Democracy
    • Justice
    • Local Government
  • Business
    • Economics
    • Farming & Fishing
    • Planning & Housing
    • Science & Technology
    • Trade
    • Transport
    • Travel & Tourism
  • Society
    • Cartoons
    • Culture
    • Community
    • Food & Drink
    • Heritage & History
    • Religion
  • Wellbeing
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
  • Region
    • Kent
    • Surrey
  • Global
    • Europe
    • European Union
    • World
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2021-2026 Kent & Surrey Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9801