• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9801
  • Authors and editors
EVENTS
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Kent and Surrey Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Society
  • Wellbeing
  • Region
  • Global
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Society
  • Wellbeing
  • Region
  • Global
No Result
View All Result
Kent and Surrey Bylines
Home Wellbeing Environment

How to achieve a circular economy

Reduce, recycle, re-use: the three Rs of the circular economy are examined by Juliet Blackburn as she considers how we deal with our waste.

Juliet Blackburn by Juliet Blackburn
18-06-2022 07:00 - Updated on 03-01-2023 12:11
in Environment
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
Control console at Environpower Energy From Waste plant

Control console at Environpower Energy From Waste plant. Photo © FCC Environment. Used with permission.

Share on Bluesky

We are never going to get anywhere near the circular economy the way we are dealing with our rubbish in the UK at present. We need to recycle almost everything and ensure that nothing goes into landfill or into the sea. There have been various scandals about British rubbish being exported to poorer countries. What does that do for the planet, as it is still dangerous for people and bad for the environment?

Energy from waste

Here in Kent our rubbish goes to incineration by Enviropower at Allington Quarry near Maidstone (291 lorry-loads per day!). The recent article by Francis Williams points out that the more rubbish being put for incineration the less is being recycled. But incineration is also not without risks, particularly of heavy metal and dioxin contamination of the ash that result from the burning of unsorted waste, mostly organic.

Incineration is an attempt to deal with rubbish that has not been properly sorted by type. If rubbish is sorted properly, then it can be made into new things. That takes us much nearer to the circular economy, whereas incineration merely give us some electricity which could probably be produced more cheaply using a wind farm.

Getting it sorted

The problem in UK is that we are expected to sort our rubbish voluntarily. Consequently, although we might try to get it right, it is really difficult to know how to do it properly. Who, for example, takes the plastic film off plastic milk bottles before recycling them. Plastic film is not supposed to be recycled. Another difficulty is bubble wrap at the base of plastic tubs of soft fruit. Again bubble wrap is not supposed to be recycled. 

If we receive deliveries from online suppliers, then we probably get plenty of cardboard boxes. How many of us recycle these correctly? We should first take the sellotape off and put it into the dustbin because plastic film cannot be recycled. Secondly, we should then flatten the box. I am not surer what the recyclers then do with it.

Topless or not?

Bottles are a major part of the recycling problem. What to do about bottle tops? It never ceases to amaze me that suppliers put completely unnecessary extra bits inside screw tops. There are various types – only some of which can be recycled with their plastic bottles – and what about the inner peeling bottle tops or the tiny strip of plastic you peel round?

Even with glass bottles, do we put the metal or plastic top into the recycling together with the glass bottle? I have just been faced with a glass olive oil bottle with a plastic inner pourer and a metal top. How do I recycle it? For starters – why do they need the inner plastic bit? Surely an ordinary glass bottle pours olive oil just fine.

Labels

What about the labels? Most labels are far too difficult to remove for anyone even to try. Actually the film labels on plastic milk cartons as mentioned above, are quite easy to remove. Most labels on glass bottles are impossible, but therein lies the benefits of cardboard which carries all the print necessary and they can be easily squashed and recycled.

Perhaps the suppliers might think about these problems rather more carefully if they were responsible for taking it all back. If they design it correctly, they could either save money or make a greater profit. That should be a great motivator for getting us nearer to a proper circular economy. The polluter really should pay.

Voluntary consumers and cash-strapped local councils are never going to get us anywhere near to the target. We are neither educated, nor motivated for this task. The manufacturers and supermarket suppliers are also not motivated to make it easy for us either. Nor do I believe that legislation on specific problems will solve it. Nothing short of making the producers entirely responsible for the cost of disposing of their packaging safely will suffice. That way they will have the incentive to remove the hard-to-recycle packaging.

We are responsible

Of course the supermarkets cannot be responsible for all our food waste. If you leave something too long in your fridge, it should not be their problem. Food waste is more easily identified by everyone and re-used in various ways. That which is edible can be used to feed people and some can be used to feed animals – although pigs do not seem to come into this category nowadays. Otherwise it has to be made safe for re-use in other products.

I have a policy that “if it has been cooked, then it goes into the food waste bin, but if it is vegetable peelings, then it is compost”. Non-gardeners, not interested in making compost, put all kitchen waste in the caddy. Most people buy ‘recyclable’ plastic sacks to line the caddy, but have you noticed these have suddenly vanished from some supermarket shelves (at Lidl, for instance)? So some people use plastic bags that are not recyclable instead, although ordinary newspaper, folded into the caddy, would recycle well.

Mixed waste is a problem

It is the mixed waste that causes the problems. Note it is separated waste, 65,000 tonnes a year, that is processed at Allington. But the Environpower website says:

“The Materials Recycling Facility has now closed and presently operates as a waste transfer station for 24,000 tonnes per year of clean recyclables and food waste.”

Only 24,000 tonnes? One suspects the more incineration, the less recycling.

Maybe we need legislation that the ‘polluter pays’ from the next government to get the circular economy properly on track.

Juliet Blackburn

Juliet Blackburn

Juliet Blackburn is the author of the book "Mandarins are for Breakfast" which is full of sailing adventures in Croatia. She also details the pitfalls and joys of buying a holiday house there. This "house with a million dollar view" sleeps up to 8 people and is available for holiday rental by the week. Please contact by text or WhatsApp on +44 7792 527521 for the book or holiday rental.

Related Posts

Shrivelled brown blackberries on a dry bramble
Environment

Facts and freebies from Dave, the water-saving plumber

by Charlotte Mbali
5 September 2026
Trail winds through a rocky hillside covered in purple heather and green shrubs, with trees and a blue sky.
Environment

UK National Parks unite to protect historic environment

by Karen Reeve
2 September 2026
A close-up picture of the ChatGPT welcome screen on a computer screen, listing its examples, capabilities, and limitations.
Environment

Generative AI: Is this the future we want?

by Alazne Mountjoy
19 August 2026
A line of firefighting planes, the one in the foreground releasing a torrent of water onto a smouldering forest
Environment

Heatwaves and wildfires: why is Europe warming so quickly?

by Mike Phillips
17 August 2026 - Updated on 22 August 2026
Bus driving behind some trees
Environment

The Campaign for Better Transport conference: Rethinking how we travel. 

by Charlotte Mbali
20 July 2026
Next Post
Rwanda

Why Rwanda ?

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

Kent and Surrey Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Kent, Surrey and beyond.

Kent & Surrey Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2021-2026 Kent & Surrey Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9801

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
    • Brexit
    • Defence
    • Democracy
    • Justice
    • Local Government
  • Business
    • Economics
    • Farming & Fishing
    • Planning & Housing
    • Science & Technology
    • Trade
    • Transport
    • Travel & Tourism
  • Society
    • Cartoons
    • Culture
    • Community
    • Food & Drink
    • Heritage & History
    • Religion
  • Wellbeing
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
  • Region
    • Kent
    • Surrey
  • Global
    • Europe
    • European Union
    • World
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2021-2026 Kent & Surrey Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9801